Market Intelligence
Greens prices at the Chicago terminal market
Current wholesale prices for greens on the Chicago, IL market, from USDA AMS Terminal Market reports. Current through September 4, 2026.
52 weeks in Chicago
Weekly medians, 2025-09-07 to 2026-08-30.
Chicago, IL ranks 3 of 3 markets pricing greens this week.
Median of 34 convertible quotes out of 759 listings seen here in the last 45 days. Packs with no net weight are excluded rather than given a guessed one.
Packs quoted here
Common questions
What is greens selling for in Chicago?
Greens is trading at a median $2.00 per pound on the Chicago, IL terminal market, from 34 convertible quotes in the last 45 days. The figure comes from USDA AMS Terminal Market reports and is current through September 4, 2026.
How does Chicago compare with other markets for greens?
Chicago, IL ranks 3 of 3 US terminal markets pricing greens this week. Prices for the same crop differ market to market, which is why it is worth checking the market you actually sell into rather than a national average.
Is there price history for greens in Chicago?
Yes — this page charts weekly median prices for greens in Chicago from 2025-09-07 to 2026-08-30, built from the same USDA reports as the current figure.
What pack sizes is greens quoted in at Chicago?
USDA currently quotes greens at Chicago, IL in 20 lb cartons and cartons/crates bunched. Only packs carrying a real net weight are converted to a price per pound; bunched and count packs are excluded rather than given a guessed weight.
Where does the Chicago price data come from?
From USDA AMS Terminal Market reports — USDA's daily record of actual wholesale sales at the Chicago, IL terminal market. It is reported sales, not a survey or a model, and it is US government work in the public domain.
The same crop elsewhere
Compare greens across every terminal market to see whether a different buyer is worth the freight.
Would the truck to another market pay for itself?
Market Intelligence puts freight against the spread, so the question stops being "who pays more" and becomes "who nets more".